Free email spam check software download for email spam test rate
August 24th, 2007
By Luca
This is a follow-up to the popular “Hints on better sending” article from September.
If a large part of your messages are not delivered, chances are they are being deleted by antispam filters by mistake, and then marked with a Spam Message Tag.
Here is a list of guidelines you can follow when creating your messages… and never wonder why my email goes straight into spam folder?
August 22nd, 2007
By Simon
Today I’ve found an interesting article about spam filters failure. I post it here because we can use some of these methods to send our clean opt-in emails through the server spam filters.
In early July of 2006 there was a prominent stream of spam messages that simply quoted three random lines of the book ‘the hobbit’, with a subject header of 6 random letters. The popular belief is that this was a ’script kiddie’ who had got hold of spam suite and was inept in it’s use. This belief was reinforced shortly after when the same messages began appearing with an image overlaid, a popular spammer trick(The seemingly innocent words allow the message to bypass filters but all that is displayed on opening the message is the picture).
It’s nice to put seemingly random and pointless messages down to inept practice on the part of the spammer, but my personal belief is this is not the case. To me this seems to look like a deliberate attempt to corrupt the improving Bayesian Filter technology. Bayesian filters work by assigning a spam score to words that are found in spam e-mails. The more regularly they appear in a spam message, the higher the spam score and the more likely a message contianing those words is to be marked as spam.
Given that piece of knowledge, imagine the implications of a concerted campaign of spammed messages that contains a short message of commonly used words. The ’spam score’ of these words is elevated, the effectiveness of the bayesian filter is diminished and when the real spam message is sent through the defenses are lowered, or indeed have been removed having provided too many false positives.
The obvious clue to me is in the way these messages are sent. Firstly the title is randomised. Many Bayesian filters treat nonsense as ‘high spam’ score. Furthermore title text is usually given a higher priority than body text. Thus a nonsense title may be enough to get a message banned by itself, and combined with a common spammer trick such as the picture overlay, it seems the spammer wanted these messages to be caught.
As more people come to rely on Bayesian filtering, this will become a more and more serious problem. We already know spammers are prepared to send out millions of messages just to get one sale. Now it appears that they are also prepared to make multiple mailings to those millions of addresses just to soften up anti-spam defenses for their one commercial mailing.
August 10th, 2007
By Simon
Here are some advices you can follow writing your email, or newsletter to have your email spam rate free optimized.
For a perfect exam of your email message spam score, download MailingCheck, it’s a free spam rate score desktop software
August 02nd, 2007
By Simon
Now, we know how to calculate an email spam score: installing our MailingCheck software for spam rating it’s free and easy. This spam score will let us know if our email will be stopped by the spam filters of the ISP (Internet Service Provider). Today we will learn the difference between minor email spam points score and major email spam points score.
Let’s consider Spam rate just a sum of points based on SpamAssassin’s rules set: each spam rule has a different value. Major spam points are usually added when the message has beed listed in some spam filter network, minor spam points are based on email composition rules.
Example: if your email has been listed in DCC (it’s a spam filter network) we add 3,6 Spam score Points… this is very bad.
If your email is in HTML format and contains the Tbody tag it gets 0,1 Spam score Points.
We can operate on the minor spam check points additions, because we cannot deal with the server side spam reporting system. What we can do is:
If our email has been marked as spam for mistake you’ll have to start a complex procedure, different for each spam reporting network. You can find these procedures linked in MailingCheck broken rule’s reason. Be sure to have a low spam score rate for your email, the inbx rate will constantly increase.
July 26th, 2007
By Simon
Today we analyze some HTML email spam score in detail. I use the SendBlaster software template engine for automating the creation of my email, plus Adobe Dreamweaver to create and modify my newsletter HTML email details.
I choose a template and I save a .eml file. Lets analyze it without changes:

it gets a BAD spam score (5,1 points).

This happens because every email needs a lot of attention before it can be sent to your customers.
Now lets analyze the common errors:
1,3 spam check points: Subject Missing
I must write something in the subject field, the title of my newsletter for example.
1 spam check point: Low body to pixel area ratio
Text is always more important than images, so I must write someting before I can put an image.
0,8 spam check points: images with 2800-3200 bytes of words
Remember what learned before: Text must have priority, so if I want to include images I must write something more, just a description it’s ok.
0,5 spam check points: spam check points: HTML only message:
We must include a text only version of the email, we just click on Sendblaster text from HTML button. 
This is done for the clients that don’t want to use HTML rendering.
0,3 spam check points: HTML tag for a big font size
I have a 40pixel style in my template… this seem interesting for my readers, but 40px is too much! I put 20pixel, it’s
enough for every title.
… now that I have a low email spam score, my email is rated GOOD (1,2 total points) by the SpamAssassin engine.

and remember, the most important part is up to you: write an interesting content for your readers.